US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 41 - 50 of 24,290
Howard v. USA
as 2:2024cv02098
Petitioner:
Charles L Howard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hall v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Ramona C Hall
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Dayton Hudson Corporation and Mason Asset Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lard v. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
as 4:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01170
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reyes v. Seeley et al
as 3:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Jose Reyes
Defendant:
Jason Seeley, Marc Hergott and Mundelein Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Killian et al
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Andrew Killian and Matthew Fitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goux v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
as 2:2024cv02093
Plaintiff:
Sariah Goux
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Neuman v O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NEUMAN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
