US District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 24,301
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff: Joseph Austin
Defendant: Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. USA
as 2:2024cv02102
Petitioner: Christine Anita Collins
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Scott v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff: Delon Scott
Defendant: Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Vanwynsberg
as 4:2024cv04083
Plaintiff: Joshua Poe
Defendant: . Vanwynsberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southall v. Borgia et al
as 3:2024cv03103
Plaintiff: Rasahn Southall
Defendant: Susan Borgia, Jamie Hause, Ashley Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patricia Keitel, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Eric Petersen, deceased v. Hart et al
as 4:2024cv04082
Plaintiff: Patricia Keitel
Defendant: Darren Hart, Rock Island County, Michael Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03105
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?