US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,268
Clark v. Carle Health Methodist Hospital
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Keith Lynell Clark
Defendant:
Carle Health Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luckett v. Nurse Hannah et al
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Jumarious Luckett
Defendant:
Nurse Hannah, Nurse Michelle, Liz DeLong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plowman v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Steven Plowman
Defendant:
Melissa Baker, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Bommiasami Veerasikku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Payne v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
. Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldrop v. Graham Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Avin Waldrop
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Green
as 4:2024cv04079
Petitioner:
Jim L. Richardson
Respondent:
Brittany Green
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
