US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,893
Guyton Jr v. Truitt et al
as 1:2023cv16464
Petitioner:
Robert Guyton Jr
Respondent:
Charles Truitt and Illinois Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16236
Petitioner:
Frederick Dean
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stempinski et al
as 1:2023cv16289
Petitioner:
Yoquan Williams
Defendant:
Richard Stepinski and Rich Stempinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alarcon v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv16237
Petitioner:
Modesto Alarcon
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leach v. Greene
as 3:2023cv50421
Petitioner:
Javarus Leach
Respondent:
Brittney Green and Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Truitt
as 1:2023cv16077
Petitioner:
Mark Downs
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saavedra-Moreno v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50423
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Saavedra-Moreno v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv15997
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Saavedra-Moreno
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50415
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rosales-Wences v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv15998
Petitioner:
Sergio Rosales-Wences
Respondent:
Mr. R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
