Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 7,233
Bush v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Teresa Maye Bush
Respondent:
Warden Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Mohamed Dida
Respondent:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Edward S. Phillips
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Hills and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00456
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Logan Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Brittany Martin
Respondent:
Logan Correctional Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01264
Petitioner:
Kevin James
Respondent:
Brittney Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01275
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Cochran
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Galloway
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Edward L. Johnson
Respondent:
Darren D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olivares Venegas v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Respondent:
McLean County Sheriff Office and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
