US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 19,065
NEATHERY v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. GARCIA
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
JEROME D. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
JOHN LONG
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT, GEO GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant:
ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
