Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30,288
BUCHANAN v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
GERALD BUCHANAN
Respondent:
TRENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Waren et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harp v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC, Allen County Sheriff, Quality Correctional LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eric David Harp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant:
DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Schmidt, Liaw and Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
LEMARKUS HAMILTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
