US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,445
Peters v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
Terry Peters
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cecil and William Cecil
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McRay v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2021cv00061
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou McRay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peacock et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
Tonya Peacock and Victoria Ashworth
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda Motor Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Zhylaiev et al
as 5:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company, Vladyslav Zhylaiev and DA Logistics Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy J. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
Douglas S. Wells
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tilford v. Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00742
Defendant:
Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Tilford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zeller v. ASICS America Corporation
as 3:2020cv00741
Plaintiff:
Trisha Zeller
Defendant:
ASICS America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gatlin et al v. DynCorp International LLC
as 5:2020cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael Weiss and Carl Gatlin
Defendant:
DynCorp International LLC and AECOM Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
