Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,256
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coplen v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Bunnell
as 5:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Aaron Evans
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Bunnell and Jailer Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Hachelle Alsip
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Alan R. Duncan
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Twitty v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Gregory M. Twitty
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Darrin Walker
Respondent:
Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 3:2023cv00649
Petitioner:
Darrin Walker
Respondent:
Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
