US District Court for the District of Maine Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SOUTH PORTLAND WINE COMPANY v. WINERY EXCHANGE INC
as 2:2019cv00037
Defendant:
WINERY EXCHANGE INC
Plaintiff:
SOUTH PORTLAND WINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TODDLE INN FRANCHISING LLC v. KPJ ASSOCIATES LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00293
Defendant:
PATRICK M MURPHY, JAMES O HASKELL, KPJ ASSOCIATES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TODDLE INN FRANCHISING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WILLIAMS v. AIRE SERV LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
TROY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AIRE SERV LLC and DWYER GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROFILE BLUEBERRY FORD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00010
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
PROFILE BLUEBERRY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PRECISION PAYROLL SERVICES LLC v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC
as 2:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
PRECISION PAYROLL SERVICES LLC
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL et al v. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC et al
as 2:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOWELL , CHASE MOZZICATO PATZ INC , PAYROLL ETC LTD and others
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC and PAYCHEX INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHADWICK-BAROSS INC v. ECOVERSE INDUSTRIES LTD
as 2:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
CHADWICK-BAROSS INC
Defendant:
ECOVERSE INDUSTRIES LTD
Counter_claimant:
ECOVERSE INDUSTRIES LTD
Counter_defendant:
CHADWICK-BAROSS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DARLINGS v. CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
DARLINGS
Defendant:
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
COAST TO COAST ENGINEERING SERVICES INC v. SMITH
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
COAST TO COAST ENGINEERING SERVICES INC
Defendant:
MARK J SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC v. DARLINGS
as 1:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Defendant:
DARLINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
