Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,778
Holtzinger v. Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Henry et al
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Henry, R. Barnes, Hetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ridgley et al v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
John Ridgley and Brandon Sweetman
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. The Carlos Mayberry Trust et al
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mayberry and Bel Sable Napoleon
Defendant:
The Carlos Mayberry Trust, The Maryland Department of Correction, Wes Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant:
Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Flynn
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Schiffer et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Jenniffer B Schiffer, John Addison Howard, Roberl Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El Bey v. Eniola et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El Bey
Defendant:
Eniola and Alien Foreiglier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Dr. Christopher Chircher
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Christopher Chircher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradby v. Worcester County Jail
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
David Bradby
Defendant:
Worcester County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
