US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Sensory Path Inc. v. Fit and Fun Playscapes LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
Sensory Path Inc.
Defendant:
Fit and Fun Playscapes LLC and Pamela A. Gunther
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
HIG Staffing Solutions, LLC v. Relias, LLC
as 1:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
HIG Staffing Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Relias, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la
Haas Outdoors, Inc. v. Dryshod International, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Haas Outdoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Dryshod International, LLC and James K. Donohue
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Priority Ambulance, LLC v. Priority Medical Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Priority Ambulance, LLC
Defendant:
Priority Medical Transport, Inc. and David Grayson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Xpansion Holdings, LLC v. The Retail Coach, LLC
as 1:2016cv00125
Defendant:
The Retail Coach, LLC
Plaintiff:
Xpansion Holdings, LLC
Counter_claimant:
The Retail Coach, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Xpansion Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
The Retail Coach, LLC v. Retail360, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
The Retail Coach, LLC
Defendant:
Retail360, LLC and R360, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Benihana National Corp. v. Hodge
as 4:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Benihana National Corp.
Defendant:
Benny Hodge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Linatex Limited v. Cleaning Parts Direct et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Linatex Limited
Defendant:
Cleaning Parts Direct , Cleaning Equipment Direct , Gayle Winchel LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Haru Holding Corp. v. Chong
as 3:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Haru Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Kim Chong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rockwool International A/S v. Rockwool Manufacturing Company
as 3:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Rockwool International A/S
Defendant:
Rockwool Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
