District of Mississippi Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 39,143
Cannon v. City of Tupelo et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff: Al Jerome Cannon
Defendant: City of Tupelo , Bart Aguirre , L. P. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Renasant Bank v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv00090
Plaintiff: Renasant Bank
Defendant: St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
Type: Contract Insurance
Butler v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00159
Plaintiff: Doris J. Butler
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gales v. Natchez Railway, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00043
Plaintiff: Delvie Gales
Defendant: Natchez Railway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Humphrey v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv00074
Plaintiff: Johnnie Humphrey
Defendant: Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, John William Carpenter
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cooper v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00060
Plaintiff: Ida Mae Cooper
Defendant: Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius Medical Center-Clarksdale
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott v. Metlife Insurance Company USA
as 1:2015cv00088
Plaintiff: Mike Scott
Defendant: Metlife Insurance Company USA
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
Minor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff: Carrie Minor
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , John Does (1-5), ABC Corporations (A-E)
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.