US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Mondi Jackson, LLC v. Alliance Barrier Films, LLC
as 1:2016cv00243
Defendant:
Alliance Barrier Films, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mondi Jackson, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Alliance Barrier Films, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Mondi Jackson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Vaughan Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
Chartis Speciality Insurance Company
Defendant:
Vaughan Foods, Inc. and C&E Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Avid Life Media Inc
as 4:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Beaulieu Group, LLC
as 4:2015cv01792
Plaintiff:
Flooring Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Beaulieu Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mackenzie v. The Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd., Inc.
as 4:2014cv01791
Plaintiff:
Maja Mackenzie
Defendant:
The Blue Buffalo Company, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stolzenburg v. Biewer Lumber, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Stolzenburg
Defendant:
Biewer Lumber, LLC and Green Tree Composites, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnsen v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 4:2014cv00594
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Napier v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A. et al.
as 4:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Bert Napier
Defendant:
Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A. and Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp., U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Brian Reeves
Defendant:
Kia Motors America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott et al v. Omega Flex, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
James Scott and Donna Scott
Defendant:
Omega Flex, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
