US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,359
Briscoe et al v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Lindell Briscoe, Brittany Arlesia Shamily, B.M.C. and others
Defendant:
St. Louis County and Detective Joseph Percich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sapa v. Eminem et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sapa
Defendant:
Eminem, Hollywood and St. Louis FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Lou Fusz
as 4:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Lou Fusz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estopare v. City of St. Louis
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
steven J estopare
Defendant:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Keys v. Extended Stay America Corporation
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Extended Stay America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
