US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 10,322
Wallace v. USA
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Carlos J. Wallace
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Busey v. Stanton
as 2:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Marcus Busey
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Clarence J. Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Corey Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey, Director of Missouri Department of Corrections, Warden of Moberly Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Doe-1 et al
as 4:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Elsworth et al
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Lori Elsworth and St. Charles County Department of Correction Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Richards
as 4:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nelson
Defendant:
Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittaker v. St. Louis County Justice Center
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jamala Whittaker
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
