US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Torts - Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Freuck v. Merrick Bank Corporation
as 4:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Ashley N Freuck
Defendant:
Merrick Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leible v. Commerce Bank et al
as 4:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Experian Information Services, LLC, Commerce Bank and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Leible
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lindsey v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Lindsey and Charles E Lindsey
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporatio and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falco v. Bank of America N.A.
as 4:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff:
Frank Falco
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2019cv00495
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff:
Frank Falco
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Armour v. Bank of America N.A.
as 4:2018cv00818
Plaintiff:
Wilson Armour
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Chapman v. Continental Service Group et al
as 4:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jared Chapman
Defendant:
Continental Service Group , Performant Recovery, Inc. and Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Worcester v. Coast Professional, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Noah A Worcester
Defendant:
Coast Professional, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Tri-State Holdings, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Bowers
Defendant:
Tri-State Holdings, LLC, Tri-State Holdings-32, LLC, Francis Jeffrey Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Federal Trade Commission v. CWB Services, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00783
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
CWB Services, LLC , Orion Services, LLC , Sandpoint Capital, LLC and others
Receiver:
Larry E. Cook, Receiver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
