Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 872
Unum v. New York/Amsterdam et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Mezzeo Unum
Defendant:
New York/Amsterdam, Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grigg v. McGrath
as 9:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
Mike McGrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grigg v. Cuffe
as 9:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
Matthew Cuffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grigg v. Lint
as 9:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
Jennifer Lint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White et al v. Desnick et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nathan White, Nicole White, Bernard Kozacki and others
Defendant:
Laurel Desnick, Park County Health Officer, Park County Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Doe No. 1 v. Roy School District et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 1
Defendant:
Roy School District and John Doe Defendants 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe No. 1 v. Billings School District No. 2
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe No. 1
Defendant:
Billings School District No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bautista v. City of Havre et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Miranda Bautista
Defendant:
City of Havre and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loftsgaard et al v. City of Glasgow et al
as 4:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Tami Kay Loftsgaard and Garth Loftsgaard
Defendant:
City of Glasgow, Joshua Nolan and John Does I-IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gladstone v. City of Billings et al
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Gladstone
Defendant:
City of Billings, Jeremiah Adams and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
