New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 38,901
Story v. National Security Agency
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Story
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Pelosi et al
as 5:2024cv00620
Defendant:
John Doe, Zachary Pelosi and Twist
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. Schemmel et al
as 1:2024cv03475
Plaintiff:
Whitt Caldwell
Defendant:
Michael Schemmel and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03340
Plaintiff:
Theodore Blair
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer "John" Flores and Police Officer Pardeep Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grunewald v. Raimondi et al
as 2:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
Albert Grunewald
Defendant:
John E Raimondi, Mary E Porter and Jennifer A Mendelsohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland v. Yeaw et al
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kimberly R. Garland
Defendant:
Michael J. Yeaw, Rose H. Chiauzzi, Keri Witherow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Song v. Trustees of Columbia University in New York
as 1:2024cv03599
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Song
Defendant:
Trustees of Columbia University in New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Dante v. Ralphs Supermarket
as 1:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Raphael Dante
Defendant:
Ralphs Supermarket
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anonymous v. Anonymous et al.
as 1:2024cv03495
Petitioner:
Anonymous
Respondent:
Anonymous et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Viloria v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03456
Plaintiff:
Justin Viloria
Defendant:
City Of New York, Arhenis Lopezestevez, Philip Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
