US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 418
v. Carlisle et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Kimberly M. Carlisle, Abram Wiebe and Miner Excavating and Trucking Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haggins v. Overturf et al
as 3:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Mary Haggins
Defendant:
Lee Overturf, Richard William, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Rippy-Brunton et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rippy-Brunton, Roger Brunton, Harold Lee Rippy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Health and Human Services Administration
as 3:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Edward Martin
Defendant:
Health and Human Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Nanteza v. Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C.
as 3:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C., Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C. doing business as Qatar Airways Q.C.S.C. Corporation and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Mrs Maria Theresa Nanteza and Maria Theresa Nanteza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00266
Defendant:
Aaron Kent, III, Western Express, Inc., Ronny L Hill doing business as Independent Service Center and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie C Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Kiselev
as 3:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Tommy Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Segiy Kiselev and Sergiy Kiselev
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Murray
Fanello v. McLane Foodservice, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00059
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc. and McLane Foodservice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Fanello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamprey v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, North Carolina CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diane E Lamprey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
