US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 21 - 30 of 80,785
Watts et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
Alexis C. Watts and William Ito
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whiteeagle et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Chaun T. Whiteeagle and Trisha Whiteeagle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitmire v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02358
Plaintiff:
Janice R. Whitmire
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Levi v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02337
Plaintiff:
William Levi
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Pearl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sczygelski v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Sczygelski
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daville v. TransCanada USA Services Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02354
Plaintiff:
Matthew Daville
Defendant:
TransCanada USA Services Inc. and Rixey Broussard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pistole v. Pistole et al
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pistole
Defendant:
Bethany Pistole and Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
McKenzie
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
LeRone McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
