Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 8,816
Mills v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02284
Petitioner:
Shad D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Henderson
as 1:2023cv02279
Petitioner:
Tremain Hogan
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. United States
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Steven Pittman, Jr.
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flenner v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv02292
Petitioner:
Cecil Lee Flenner
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Springs v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Cory M Spirngs and Cory M Springs
Respondent:
Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv02254
Petitioner:
Deonte Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2023cv02252
Petitioner:
Rebeccah Lewis
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Respondent:
Warden Erin Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. McConahay
as 4:2023cv02235
Petitioner:
Ronald Chappell
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sands v. May
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Sands
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. May
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Larry D. Stewart
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
