District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 111 - 120 of 165,604
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Alinda Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01945
Plaintiff:
Nikki Rice
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant:
Brenda Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Ohm et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Stan Ohm
Defendant:
Randy H Dupree, Christopher J. Regan and Brett McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
McComb v. Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Damitree McComb
Respondent:
Marion Correctional Institution, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarcangelo v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65314
Plaintiff:
Shaun Diarcangelo
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strong v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65315
Plaintiff:
Tanesha Strong
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Means v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65316
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Means
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
