US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 111 - 120 of 857
RSS Feed | View as table
Williams v. Nunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00373
Petitioner: Brian G. Williams
Respondent: Scott Crow, John O'Connor, John O and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Pettigrew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00370
Petitioner: Dennis Martin
Respondent: Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smallen v. Nunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00364
Petitioner: Robert L. Smallen
Respondent: Scott Crow and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Labansat v. Bryant
as 6:2021cv00360
Petitioner: Richard Labansat
Respondent: Carter County, Carter County, OK and Chris Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tarkington v. Harding We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00352
Petitioner: Adrian A Tarkington and Adrian A. Tarkington
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tarkington v. Harding We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00353
Petitioner: Adrian A Tarkington and Adrian A. Tarkington
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hammer v. Nunn
as 6:2021cv00346
Petitioner: Anthony Shane Hammer
Defendant: Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hairrell v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00341
Petitioner: Cecil Hairrell
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kilpatick v. Crow
as 6:2021cv00340
Petitioner: Chad W. Kilpatick and Chad W. Kilpatrick
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hurst v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00308
Petitioner: Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Respondent: Scott Crow, Mark Bowen and John O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?