US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 835
Cathey v. Everett et al
as 6:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bill Cathey
Defendant:
Leisha Von Everett, Kim Hall, Bruce Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Calhoun
Defendant:
Terry Garland, April Lentz, Mike Self and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritesman v. Ashton
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ashton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Schrum et al
as 6:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Chris Schrum, Johnny Dallis, Sylvia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenton Busby
Defendant:
The State of Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritesman v. Summers
as 6:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ron Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
