US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,713
Martinez v. Sellers et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Kylee Martinez
Defendant:
Skyler Sellers and Board of County Commissioners of Adair County, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beaver v. Denver Amazon
as 4:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bettina B Beaver
Defendant:
Denver Amazon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Briggs et al v. Slatton-Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Leslie Briggs, Evan Watson and Henry A Meyer, III
Defendant:
Carrie Slatton-Hodges and Crystal Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bethea v. Biden
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Chiet Ralph C Bethea, Chief Ralph C Bethea and Chief Rapha Bethyah
Defendant:
Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bethea v. biden
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chiet Ralph C Bethea
Defendant:
Joseph biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
