US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,706
Cupples v. Carriage Village, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
John Cupples, Jr
Defendant:
Carriage Village, LLC and Westwind Enterprises, LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Edward D White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tubbs v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Paul Tubbs
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, R Russo and Police Officer Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Winningham v. City of Broken, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
City of Broken, Oklahoma, City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma, Tulsa county and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
