Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,783
Brooks v. Seigars et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks
Defendant:
Jason Seigars, Paul Woodward and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Rinks et al
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Byrd
Defendant:
Corey Rinks and Dylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Patrick Morgan and Unknown Named Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Tulsa Housing Authority
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Troy Decker
Defendant:
Tulsa Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kosier v. Garvin County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Austin Kosier
Defendant:
Garvin County Jail Staff and Garvin County Sheriffs Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sturm v. Goldey et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Karl Jacob Sturm
Defendant:
FNU Goldey, FNU Bouche, FNU Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coker v. Stitt et al
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Coker
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyers v. Cleveland County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
