Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,785
Jones v. Turnkey Medical Services
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Turnkey Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hibbard v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Hibbard
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, Justin Mcree and Jacob Maryhew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Steudeman v. Sequoyah County Detention Center et al
as 6:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Dustin Steudeman and DJ
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Detention Center and Jeremy Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaver v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Defendant:
Dylan Carl Beaver, McIntosh County et al., McIntosh County Sherriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyre v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyre
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2024cv00018
Respondent:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Petitioner:
Jimmie McCay, III
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Elroy et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Zackry Deon Smith and Zachary
Defendant:
Micheal Elroy, Alyssa Aguilera and Kevin Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elix v. Vann et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey Elix
Defendant:
Timothy Vann, Wayne McKinney and Stephens County SFDP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
