Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 402
Williams v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
Javier Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Lindsey et al
as 5:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Chad William Reed
Defendant:
Ron Lindsey, Taylor Williams, Tasha Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truitt v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Susanne Campbell, Dr Jeanna Morgan, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Star et al
as 5:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Michael Webb
Defendant:
FNU Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. McClain County Jail
as 5:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Shuran Nelson
Defendant:
McClain County Jail, McClain County Sheriffs, FNU Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. Grady County Jail
as 5:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Larosha Hudson and LaTosha Hudson
Defendant:
Grady County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett, Christopher J Magnum and Chris Mangum
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Chaplin Bell, Chaplin Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Nganga et al
as 5:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Spears
Defendant:
Ginette Nganga and FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
