U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 51,351
v. Dikih et al
as 3:2025cv00441
Defendant:
Ury Dikih, Etem Missark, KTS Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Oravetz v. Lane County Oregon
as 6:2025cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Lane County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd v. Powin, LLC
as 3:2025cv00442
Petitioner:
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd
Respondent:
Powin, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Chowdhury et al v. Khan et al
as 3:2025cv00443
Plaintiff:
Asif Hasnat Chowdhury, Farzana Ferdous, Hasib Islam Bhuiyan and others
Defendant:
Masudur Rahman Khan and Taslema Sultana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
McAllister v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2025cv00438
Petitioner:
Patrick Michael McAllister
Respondent:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaster et al v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv00439
Plaintiff:
Valerie Jaster, Josh Jaster and Beverly J. Pruitt
Defendant:
Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harper v. Watson & Chalin Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2025cv00435
Plaintiff:
John Harper
Defendant:
Watson & Chalin Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc
as 3:2025cv00436
Plaintiff:
John Harper
Defendant:
Amur Equipment Finance, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. Kruesi et al
as 6:2025cv00434
Defendant:
Lindsey Kruesi, Oregon Department of Corrections and Tony Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.