US District Court for the District of Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 50,879
Fial et al v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
John Fial and J.F.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmore v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ramone Palmore
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fernald v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv02155
Defendant:
Shane Nelson, Deschutes County, John / Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Fernald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Murch v. Sell My House Now LLC
as 3:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Jessica Murch
Defendant:
Sell My House Now LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barocio Sanchez v. Reyes
as 2:2024cv02150
Respondent:
Erin Reyes
Petitioner:
Jose Maria Barocio Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francabandera v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv02152
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Petitioner:
Mason Francabandera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickey v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
as 3:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hickey
Defendant:
Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Biebel v. California Midwest Xpress, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02145
Defendant:
Wendell E. Dreasher, Jr. and California Midwest Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tracey A. Biebel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
