Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 3,330
Gaines et al v. City of Eugene
as 6:2023cv01538
Plaintiff:
Shaun Gaines, James Morrison, Kevin R. Eggleston and others
Defendant:
City of Eugene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vance v. Sheqan et al
as 6:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Vance
Defendant:
Diana Sheqan, Carel Sheqan, Harold Sheqan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weybright v. County of Marion et al
as 6:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Brogan M. Weybright
Defendant:
County of Marion, John Doe, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crites-Bachert v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon
as 3:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Melanie Crites-Bachert
Defendant:
Providence Health & Services - Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaeffer v. Mumey et al
as 3:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Noah Schaeffer
Defendant:
Scott Mumey, Joseph Zepeda and Sean Mumey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Berman v. Kotek et al
as 6:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Preston Jacob Berman and Preston Berman
Defendant:
Governor Christine Kotek, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, Interim Director Dave Baden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quintero et al v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Quintero, Austen Letrick and RV Main, LLC
Defendant:
City of Medford, Ben Lytle, Ryan Groom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gabbert v. Gabbert et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Kelly Gabbert
Defendant:
Matthew Gabbert and Josephine County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hardnett v. City of Portland
as 3:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hardnett
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cambrium v. CSL Plasma et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Wyling Lansing Cambrium
Defendant:
CSL Plasma and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
