District Court Cases in Oregon
Cases 71 - 80 of 49,448
J.M.H. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
J.M.H.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, Christine Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Khadija Moyer
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bernards v. Prod Holding Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Jacob James Bernards
Defendant:
Prod Holding Inc., Progressive Leasing LLC, Progressive Finance U.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Salem Police Department
as 6:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Beltran
Defendant:
Salem Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Brock et al
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
John Shaw
Defendant:
Philip Brock and Clackamas County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. E.O.C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
E.O.C.I. and Chaplain Zuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosengard et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
David B. Rosengard and Diana Wiener
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
