US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 323,471
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01798
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01797
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA & VICINITY et al v. KEVIN RYDER, INC
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff: TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and MARIA SCHEELER
Defendant: KEVIN RYDER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PETROGIANNIS
as 2:2024cv01795
Plaintiff: MARIA PETROGIANNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATEL v. ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
as 5:2024cv01808
Plaintiff: GARIMA PATEL
Defendant: ANOOPAM MISSION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff: DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant: CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, JEFF FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?