US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 141
REESE et al v. JACOBOWITZ et al
as 2:2015cv01523
Plaintiff:
TAMARA REESE , JEREMY REESE and FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Defendant:
WILLIAM JACOBOWITZ , RIFKIE JACOBOWITZ and EARNEST MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PHILLIPS et al v. JAMES et al
as 2:2015cv01139
Plaintiff:
GLADYS V. PHILLIPS, PEGGY J. PHILLIPS, JOSEPH D. PHILLIPS, 3rd and others
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
WEIMER v. CIMA et al
as 2:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS WEIMER
Defendant:
JAMES P. CIMA, ELIZABETH SUE CIMA and CINDY TURLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHATMAN v. WESTERN MANOR APT et al
as 2:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E. CHATMAN
Defendant:
WESTERN MANOR APT and DORNISH LAW OFFICES P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROWN v. IKEA PROPERTY, INC.
as 2:2014cv01713
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
IKEA PROPERTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BROWN v. MARIA ASSOCIATES
as 2:2014cv01712
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
MARIA ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. WP PLAZA POINTE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
as 2:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
WP PLAZA POINTE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. ROBINSON MALL, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01715
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
ROBINSON MALL, INC., J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INC and SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HILDEBRAND v. HAUG et al
as 2:2014cv01400
Plaintiff:
BRETT A. HILDEBRAND, SR.
Defendant:
EDWARD C. HAUG, JR. and BRENDA HAUG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EDWARDS v. EAST LIBERTY PLACE NORTH
as 2:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
DONALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
EAST LIBERTY PLACE NORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
