US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,385
RUBINOSKI v. PA IG ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
MISTER KENNETH RUBINOSKI
Defendant:
PA IG ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
MAJOR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING V. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. MCCRADY et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER MCCRADY and ATTORNEY LISA VANQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
