US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,240
Hilton v. USA
as 2:2023cv00010
Petitioner: Brandy D. Hilton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coleman v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner: Rashaud L. Coleman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. USA
as 2:2023cv00005
Petitioner: Gregory Thomas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gilmore v. USA (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00027
Petitioner: Kedaris T. Gilmore
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. USA
as 4:2023cv00001
Petitioner: Mark Daniel Allen
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniel v. USA
as 1:2023cv00009
Petitioner: Brian Daniel
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gould v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00311
Petitioner: Mark Douglas Gould
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Watson v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00436
Petitioner: Preston Andrew Watson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coffelt v. USA
as 1:2022cv00296
Petitioner: Izaac Coffelt
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meacham v. USA
as 2:2022cv00149
Petitioner: Brandon David Meacham
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?