US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 953
Weaver v. Knox County et al
as 3:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
Linda Weaver
Defendant:
Helen Ross McNabb Mental Health Foundation, Inc., Michael Maurer, Henry Bright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rippey v. Bedford County Jail
as 4:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
John Rippey
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. Bedford County Jail
as 4:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mario Gutierrez
Defendant:
Bedford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Scott E Poole
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallis v. Civic Corporation et al (ASH)
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Benjamin T Wallis
Defendant:
Civic Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unicoi County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00139
Defendant:
Barbra Scalf, Kenny Jones, Darrel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Morgan County Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2017cv00150
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Niner, Spall and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Hamby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Corey Fernando Russell
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Daniel K Gardner
Defendant:
Sullivan County Jail and W Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
