US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,569
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Clark
Defendant:
Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #049 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe #049
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. City of Columbia, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brown
Defendant:
City of Columbia, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chorazghiazad v. Holmes et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Chorazghiazad
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Holmes and Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #50 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
John Doe #50
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #052 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #052
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #53 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #53
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry et al v. Tennessee Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Howard Gentry and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Treasury, David H. Lillard, Jr. and The Nashville Community Bail Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Fentress County et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Trisha Winningham
Defendant:
Fentress County, Michael Reagon, Fast Access Healthcare, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
