Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,866
Stephens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Stephens
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Seiber v. Shelby County Government
as 2:2024cv02261
Plaintiff:
Mary E Seiber
Defendant:
Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lindsey v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Lequintin Lindsey
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, LLC. and Dollar Tree Family Dollar, LLC.
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manning v. University Health System, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
University Health System, Inc. and The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Greg Manning
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
