US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,041
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Sam B. Hall Federal Building et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Travion Dondrell Young
Defendant:
Sam B. Hall Federal Building, Bradney Randall Smith, Cortne Maresse Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senn v. Mosbey et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Mosbey, EB and FNU Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senn v. Goss, et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Goss, FNU Sherpitear and FNU Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Senn v. Jefferson
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Senn
Defendant:
FNU Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Lynesha Square and Haleigh Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keaton v. Martin
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Dennis Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
