US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,080
Greene v. Lawrence A. Shafron, M.D., P.A.
as 4:2024cv00328
Defendant:
Lawrence A. Shafron, M.D., P.A. and Advanced Eye Care Center
Plaintiff:
Lauren Greene
Lafleur et al v. Razor Oilfield Services LLC
as 6:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shaphan Lafleur
Defendant:
Razor Oilfield Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Reynolds v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Reynolds
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Spinosa v. FWVape Bros, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kevin Spinosa
Defendant:
FWVape Bros, LLC, Waleed Zafar and Fahad Zafar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1554 Federal Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Southern Veterinary Partners, LLC
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Taylor Johnson
Defendant:
Southern Veterinary Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hopkins v. Capital One
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Tanaj Hopkins
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hare v. Spencer Fane LLP
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jaspal Singh Hare
Defendant:
Spence Fane LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Bursten v. Christie Cannon Real Estate Group, Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Hilarie Bursten
Defendant:
Christie Cannon Real Estate Group, Inc. and Christie Cannon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
R&L Carriers, Inc. v. George
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
R&L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark George
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hodges v. Grassano Texas Inc
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Hodges
Defendant:
Grassano Texas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
