US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 108,686
James-Davis v. Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc
as 3:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jolinda James-Davis
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc doing business as Walgreens Store #10193
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert v. Zimmer Biomet Holding Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Morrison Lee Robert
Defendant:
Zimmer Biomet Holding Inc and Biomet Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gibson v. Terry County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr.
Respondent:
Terry County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Eastridge et al
as 7:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Joseph Eastridge, Ms. Shannon Jones, Arturo Aguitera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Jennings et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Walter Mosley
Defendant:
Debra Jennings, Christi Greenwalt, John Clum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lotus Sky, LLC dba Oyo Hotel v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lotus Sky, LLC dba Oyo Hotel
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Wescott et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Gill
Defendant:
NFN Wescott, NFN Mendoza and NFN Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
