Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 41,829
Thomas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Mahoney
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Keep Separate Inmate Assailants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Rymir Phillips
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Dicky
as 4:2024cv01482
Petitioner:
JorCorey Deshawn McGee
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rector v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Lonnie Henry Rector, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Eric Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
