US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 25,035
Mosier v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Mosier
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smith v. Corbin et al
as 7:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Superintendent Clay Corbin, Captain H. Custer, A. Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linton v. Trump et al
as 7:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
David Linton
Defendant:
Donald Trump and MAGA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manougian v. Calixte et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ara Manougian
Defendant:
Hans M. Calixte and Lolo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lipscomb v. Crout et al
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Eric Crout, Kristen Haight and Chad Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohlman v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Melissa Bohlman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Winrow v. Hill Valley Healthcare, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kim Winrow
Defendant:
Hill Valley Healthcare, LLC and Fork Union SNF Operations LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Twichell v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Twichell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
