US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,678
Hinton v. Warden
as 7:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Gary A. Hinton
Respondent:
Unknown and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
James Madison Franklin Hughes, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Warden
as 7:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
Gary A. Hinton
Respondent:
Unknown and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 7:2023cv00353
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00357
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Unknown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Reyes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00351
Petitioner:
Justin Leon Walker
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillery v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Carter Tillery
Respondent:
Warden Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Madison v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Otis T. Madison
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00332
Petitioner:
Douglas Scott McBride
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
