US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 11,285
Cecil v. Novak
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Harris
as 7:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
C.N. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Moss
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. RSW Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Jessica Jenkins
Respondent:
RSW Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kersey v. Rockbridge Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Kersey
Defendant:
Rockbridge Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Ballad Health et al
as 7:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
Ballad Health, M.D. Robert B. Jolley and R.N. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Hagy et al
as 7:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Davis
Defendant:
Officer M. Hagy and Tikki Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennington v. USA
as 5:2024cv81551
Petitioner:
Eric Keith Pennington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
