Washington Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 185
Finch et al v. HomeStreet Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Deanna Finch and Brian Finch
Defendant:
HomeStreet Inc and Dan Huegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martin v. Ni et al
as 2:2017cv01414
Plaintiff:
Flecia Martin
Defendant:
Hong Ni, Breawood Condominiums, Haowen Ni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Markham v. Stadium View Condominium Association et al
as 3:2017cv05733
Plaintiff:
Gerald W Markham
Defendant:
Stadium View Condominium Association and Donald Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oxford House Inc et al v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2017cv05135
Plaintiff:
Oxford House Inc , Joel A Harding and Joel A Harding Living Trust
Defendant:
Country Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Procter et al v. Riverview Lutheran Retirement Community of Spokane
as 4:2017cv05113
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M Procter and Steve Procter
Defendant:
Riverview Lutheran Retirement Community of Spokane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M Procter and Steve Procter
Defendant:
Riverview Lutheran Retirement Community of Spokane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cale v. The United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2017cv00935
Plaintiff:
Edward Cale
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service, Kiran Chawla and Navdeep Dhaliwal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Parodi et al
as 3:2017cv05425
Plaintiff:
Roy V Randall, Sr
Defendant:
Nick Parodi, Kacy Jones, Hillary Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Nikita D Smith
Defendant:
Wasatch Property Management, Inc and Wasatch Pool Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Value Inn 22246
as 2:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Hill
Defendant:
Value Inn 22246
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
