US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 422
Casari v. Conntek Integrated Solutions
as 2:2020cv00630
Plaintiff:
Derek A Casari
Defendant:
Conntek Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Guo v. Ovation Hand Institute Management LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Richard Harrison, Ovation Hand Institute, LLC, Ovation Hand Institute Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Brian Robert Blazer v. Best Bee Brothers LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
RSP INC and Best Bee Brothers LLC
Plaintiff:
Brian Robert Blazer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Inland Diamond Products Co. v. Cherry Optical Inc.
as 1:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Inland Diamond Products Co.
Defendant:
Cherry Optical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Voices.com Inc v. MediaZam LLC
as 2:2020cv00292
Plaintiff:
Voices.com Inc
Defendant:
MediaZam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pioneer Pet Products LLC v. Innovative Design et al
as 2:2020cv00176
Plaintiff:
Pioneer Pet Products LLC
Defendant:
Innovative Design and Bed Bath & Beyond
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Wash World Inc v. Belanger Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01562
Defendant:
Piston OPW Inc, Dover Corporation, Belanger Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wash World Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Island Intellectual Property LLC v. American Deposit Management LLC
as 2:2019cv01038
Defendant:
American Deposit Management LLC
Plaintiff:
Island Intellectual Property LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lexidine LLC v. Camera Source LLC
as 2:2019cv00928
Plaintiff:
Lexidine LLC
Defendant:
Camera Source LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gentex Corporation v. Traffic and Parking Control Co Inc
as 2:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Traffic and Parking Control Co Inc
Plaintiff:
Gentex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
