US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,601
Dabney v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Mark A Dabney
Respondent:
Warden Michael G Gierach and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv00843
Petitioner:
Kalvin E Vaughn
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Virgil v. Wells
as 1:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Eddie Lamont Virgil
Respondent:
Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Wells
as 2:2023cv00820
Petitioner:
Robert Darius Spencer
Respondent:
Johnson and Warden Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solberg v. Krueger
as 1:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Young v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2023cv00788
Petitioner:
Bradley James Young
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dantzler v. Tegels
as 2:2023cv00755
Petitioner:
jermarro S. dantzler and Jermarro S Dantzler
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eggum v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv00632
Petitioner:
Keith Eggum
Respondent:
Randy Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Gierach
as 2:2023cv00626
Petitioner:
Mark K Anderson, Jr
Respondent:
Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
